News

Brown Sims, a Houston law firm, successfully represented Adam Joseph Resources (AJR) in a complaint against CNA Metals which was arbitrated for two years. After AJR was awarded almost $504,000, AJR colluded with CNA to create a settlement between the two entities which cut Brown Sims out of the deal entirely, reduced CNA’s overall costs and resulted in an increased recovery for AJR. Neither Brown Sims nor the district court was aware of the settlement.
First Acceptance Insurance Company of Georgia insured the at-fault party in a serious automobile accident involving multiple claimants with significant injuries. The policy limits of First Acceptance’s policy was $50,000. Two of the many claimants made demands on First Acceptance to tender limits and settle their claims. First Acceptance failed to respond to this correspondence, and instead, attempted to reach a global resolution with all claimants.
Landowners received some extra protections during the Mississippi Legislature’s 2019 session. The Landowner Protection Act, SB2901, limits the ability of an injured party to bring suit against a landowner or a manager/ operator of property for injuries caused by a third party unless the landowner or manager/operator of the property was actively engaged in activity which allowed the conduct of the third party to occur.
Sheaneter Bogan worked at MTD Customer Group for about 20 years. During her employment, she completed community college coursework that allowed MTD to promote her to a machinist position. She also took classes to earn a degree in social work. Human resources notified her they would only allow her a flexible schedule for work-related schooling. She was later terminated for returning from lunch late after a class. She filed a suit alleging race and sex discrimination.
Andrew Yanez’s Texas property sustained flood damage during a storm in 2016. He filed a claim with his insurance company, American Strategic Insurance Corporation, through which he had a Standard Flood Insurance Policy. He’d also filed a prior flood loss claim on the property in 2014. After an adjuster evaluated the property, ASIC paid Yanez $1,315.20, which was less than what Yanez believed was due. Yanez lost an administrative appeal because he failed to provide evidence that he made repairs required after the 2014 flood and before the 2016 flood.
In Washington State, an Allstate customer claims both the insurance company and their adjuster acted in bad faith when it attempted to settle his underinsured motorist claim for less than the policy limit following an accident. The adjuster assigned to the claim reportedly determined that the insured was partially at fault for the accident because he was on his phone and ran a stop sign. The evidence, however, showed that both the police and Allstate’s own accident reconstructionist determined that the insured was not on his phone and had stopped at the stop sign in question.
Our primary mission at Webb Sanders & Williams is to provide the best representation possible for our clients. When the cases we were involved in are cited in arguments of other cases, it’s icing on the cake. Earlier this month two of our previous cases  Rhoden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 32 F. Supp. 2d 907, 913 (S.D. Miss. 1998) and Boteler v. State Farm, 876 So. 2d 1067 (Miss. Ct. App.
When a Richard Ruth’s Bar & Grill customer, Emmanuel Kehagias, was assaulted at the bar, owners Richard and Jane Ruth failed to notify their commercial general liability insurer, Founders, of the incident. When Kehagias’s attorney sent a letter of representation, the Ruths forwarded the letter to their agent’s wholesaler Hull & Company.
The U.S. Department of Labor has again addressed changes to the salary threshold for overtime pay exemptions. The proposed amendment to the rule raises the minimum annual salary requirement for the white-collar exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act from $23,600 to $35,308. DOL attempted to amend the rule in 2016, but a federal court in Texas blocked enforcement of the rule shortly before it took effect.
Denny Rice succeeded in his wrongful termination suit against Merchants Foodservice to a tune of $1.25 million in lost future earnings. On appeal Merchants Foodservice argued Rice wasn’t due to collect lost future earnings because his new job paid more than he earned as a truck driver with Merchants. The appeals court denied the appeal calling their reasoning faulty logic.
To raise capital toward the development of a prototype aircraft and to purchase a competing aircraft manufacturer, Kestral Aircraft Co. (Kestral) entered into an agreement with Living Benefits Asset Management, LLC, (Living Benefits) to purchase and sell life settlements. Kestral never raised the funds he’d hoped to raise and never purchased any life settlements.
Does an insurance policy’s Cooperation Clause require the insured to follow the insurance company’s recommendation regarding settlements? Petroleum Solutions, Incorporated (PSI) faced a suit from Bill Head Enterprises (Head) because a fuel tank systems constructed and installed by PSI on Head’s property leaked. PSI brought claims against Titeflex Corporation, the manufacturer of the flex connector responsible for the lead. Titeflex countersued.
Premier Directional Drilling, L.P., utilizes directional-driller-consultants (DD) and measurement-while-drilling-consultants (MWD) in its oil drilling operation. Some DDs are classified as employees; others, independent contractors (IC). Five ICs filed suits against Premier alleging they were inaccurately classified as ICs and not employees. The district court awarded damages in favor of the plaintiffs.
The case of a Chicago salesman accused of selling trade secrets to a Chinese company caught the eye of attorneys last month when it went to trial. Robert O’Rourke, who spend 30 years in sales for cast iron products manufacturer Dura-Bar, accepted employment with Dura’s Chinese competitor. Before he left, however, O’Rourke downloaded 1,900 files containing Dura trade secrets. O’Rourke does not deny downloading the files. His defense team denies the files were trade secrets because he claims Dura did not take “reasonable measure” to protect the information.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit certified two questions to the Mississippi Supreme Court dealing with voluntary payment of an insurance company. An explosion at Omega Protein Corporation’s Moss Point, Mississippi location resulted in the death of an employee of Accu-Fab & Construction, Inc. Omega had insurance coverage from ACE American Insurance Company and First Specialty Insurance Corporation.
In a split 2-1 decision, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the District Court’s opinion that agents of American Family Life Insurance Company are employees not contractors due to unique facts of significant control exerted by the company. The Sixth Circuit based its decision on the weight given to independent contractor agreements. The case gives relief to many insurance carriers who have watched the case closely.
In 2002, Eric Stricklett drove a vehicle which struck and injured eleven-year-old Scott Alves. Alves’s parents provided Stricklett’s insurer, Summit Insurance Company, with Alves’s medical records but told them the child continued to undergo medical treatment for his injuries and they had not received his medical bills. They did submit the medical bills to Summit a short time later. In March 2003, Summit informed the Alveses their investigation showed no fault on the part of Stricklett for the accident and they would make no offers.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found SuperShuttle franchisee van drivers are independent contractors, not employees. The NLRB applied the entrepreneurial opportunity principle to the common law independent contractor analysis.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit joined the Eleventh Circuit in denying job applicants a disparate impact claim under the ADEA. The case centers around Dale Kleber, a 58-year-old attorney, who applied for an in-house counsel position with CareFusions Corporation. Although the job description required “3 to 7 years (no more than seven years) of relevant legal experience” and Kleber held more than 7 years experience, he applied for the job. A younger candidate whose experience met the requirements was hired instead. Kleber filed a disparate impact violation suit.
When three employees left the employment of Kelly Services, a staffing agency based in Minnesota, and went to work for a competitor, the agency filed a suit alleging a violation of their contract’s non compete clause. Kelly Services obtained a preliminary injunction that lasted through the one-year duration of the non compete agreement. When the injunction was lifted, the employer continued the case seeking attorneys’ fees. The non compete clause required the employee to pay all attorneys fees incurred to enforce the agreement.

Pages